| 1 |
On 26/02/07, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Stuart Howard wrote: |
| 6 |
> > !!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been |
| 7 |
> > !!! pulled into the dependency graph: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > ('ebuild', '/', 'app-editors/vim-core-7.0.201', 'merge') pulled in by |
| 10 |
> > ('ebuild', '/', 'app-editors/gvim-7.0.201', 'merge') |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > ('ebuild', '/', 'app-editors/vim-core-7.0.174', 'nomerge') pulled in by |
| 13 |
> > ('ebuild', '/', 'app-editors/vim-7.0.174', 'nomerge') |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You can't have gvim-7.0.201 and vim-7.0.174 installed simultaneously |
| 16 |
> because they depend on different versions of vim-core. The solution |
| 17 |
> is to either mask gvim-7.0.201 and vim-core-7.0.201 or unmask |
| 18 |
> vim-7.0.201: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Agreed |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> echo app-editors/vim >> /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Zac |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
My issue is more though why is portage trying and failing to install |
| 28 |
two versions of vim at all as so far as I am aware I have never made |
| 29 |
such a request of it. |
| 30 |
Just the latest ~* version will be fine for me. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives