1 |
Tom Wijsman wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500 |
3 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to |
6 |
>> change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of |
7 |
>> you changing what you do to fix the problem? |
8 |
> Everyone else is okay with it, as only one in a thousand speaks up |
9 |
> about it; the problem rather is with that 0.1% than that it is with me, |
10 |
> as I just use mailing lists as they are supposed to be used. |
11 |
|
12 |
FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After |
13 |
that, you don't exist to them. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
>> To put it another way, you want to inconvenience everyone else |
17 |
>> instead of doing things the way everyone else does it and has done it |
18 |
>> for a long time? |
19 |
> That's what the Reply-To header mungling does; it makes you unable to |
20 |
> tell me through the Reply-To header what you want, and as a result I |
21 |
> need to use the default than to be able to automatically respect it. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> As can be seen, that is an automatic guarantee that it will reach you. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Just as well as the automatic guarantee that the same Message ID is the |
26 |
> same message; and thus, your mail client should be filtering duplicates. |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
To my knowledge, the only emails I have not got when someone sent to |
30 |
this mailing list is when the mailing list server had problems and that |
31 |
was a long long time ago. You send a email to the list and the list |
32 |
gets the email. There is NO need to CC everyone so that they get dups. |
33 |
Period. We don't need a CC guarantee. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
>> Here's a hint. I can see a LOT of people adding you to their |
37 |
>> blacklist. You could very well end up talking to yourself on this |
38 |
>> mailing list. |
39 |
> Here's a hint. Lots of people appear to respond to me. |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
This is a COMMUNITY effort here and you seem to not want to be a part of |
43 |
the community. When I first came here, my email program sent html. I |
44 |
was told that HTML is not appreciated here. Some even provided examples |
45 |
of why it is not appreciated. I asked how to change that, I was given |
46 |
the help needed to change it and I have made sure that it remained that |
47 |
way since. There was a point in time where I changed software and |
48 |
couldn't find the setting. I asked if anyone knew where it was and got |
49 |
the help needed to get it set back to plain text, as EVERYONE else does |
50 |
on this list. |
51 |
|
52 |
If you don't want to be here by the standards set, say good bye. I'm |
53 |
trying to help you by telling you this. People will blacklist you and |
54 |
never say a word about it. I suspect quite a few already has. It would |
55 |
be wise to change your way of handling this list or you will lose. |
56 |
|
57 |
Dale |
58 |
|
59 |
:-) :-) |
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |