1 |
On 25/06/2013 23:44, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 25 Jun 2013 21:59:20 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
>> On 25/06/2013 21:10, Mick wrote: |
4 |
>>> Hi All, |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> I am considering my options for a new rig destined to last a few years |
7 |
>>> and one of the Dell machines on offer has this Intel SRT fake-raid |
8 |
>>> feature, which after some cursory googling, I am not entirely sure will |
9 |
>>> work with Linux. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> bah, that fake-raid. Just discard it completely, it's a way for windows |
12 |
>> uses who don't have lvm-awesomeness to have big drives and not have to |
13 |
>> do anything to get it. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I think it is used to RAID the SSD onto the hard drive, so that it can be |
16 |
> replicated onto a new SSD if/when the original goes bad. |
17 |
|
18 |
This is a laptop right? |
19 |
|
20 |
That makes no sense - when you mirror RAID an SSD onto a spinning disk, |
21 |
you get a combined drive the size of the spinning disk and the SSD |
22 |
becomes a fashion accessory. Which is why Dell usually disable RAIDing |
23 |
an SSD and regular disk in the purchase options |
24 |
|
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> Just use lvm and/or software raid to do the job right. You will not |
28 |
>> regret using the appropriate tool for the job like this. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> OK, so dmraid and mdadm will do the same for Linux? |
31 |
|
32 |
Yes |
33 |
|
34 |
> |
35 |
> How do people mirror their SD onto the SATA, or what is the recommended way to |
36 |
> safeguard the SSD installed OS? |
37 |
|
38 |
You copy it. You do not raid it. With two disks, just rsync over |
39 |
whatever you need whenever you need to do it. |
40 |
|
41 |
Unless that is, Dell's website is using the PR/Marketing definition of |
42 |
what RAID is. By definition, no-one that ever reads this mailing list |
43 |
can understand that definition |
44 |
|
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
>>> As a side issue, I am not sure whether to fork out for an i7 Haswell, or |
48 |
>>> go for good ol' AMD FX-8350 ... |
49 |
>>> |
50 |
>>> Is the single thread i7 superiority going to trump AMDs 8 real cores for |
51 |
>>> web development, image editing and browsing activities? |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>> Your cell phone will cope with that work load just fine |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Ha! I'm still using an old Nokia feature phone and I mostly use it to make |
56 |
> telephone calls! O_O |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
>> Don't stress about it, your question is on the order of magnitude of |
60 |
>> wondering if 5 horses or 4 camels are better for carrying one paper bag |
61 |
>> of groceries home from the supermarket. The truth is, the basket in |
62 |
>> front of granny's bicycle is perfectly adequate, and probably faster too |
63 |
> |
64 |
> LOL!! |
65 |
> |
66 |
> So, you're saying that other than at compile time I won't notice the |
67 |
> difference? |
68 |
|
69 |
You will notice the grunt those i7s can deliver when you start to do |
70 |
this (sort of typical for mine...): |
71 |
|
72 |
3 virtualbox vms running, 1 Windows for IE and Office |
73 |
30 tabs open in firefox |
74 |
emerge world going on set to -j32 -l8 |
75 |
30-odd konsole tabs open, often more than half tailing a log file at |
76 |
more than 200 lines a minute |
77 |
the usual desktop apps (mail, skype, movie playing in one corner) |
78 |
|
79 |
I sort of just keep loading it up till I run out of things to leave |
80 |
open, and never notice the difference. This is an 8 core i7 with 16G RAM |
81 |
and 128G SSD - complete total overkill for any rational usage, even a |
82 |
busy devops sysadmin - but we get good prices on the company corporate |
83 |
account |
84 |
|
85 |
It all comes down to what you really *need* as opposed to how much |
86 |
techie-bling you *want* :-) |
87 |
|
88 |
-- |
89 |
Alan McKinnon |
90 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |