| 1 |
On 4/22/21 9:25 AM, karl@××××××××.se wrote: |
| 2 |
> No IP doesn't prohibit ethernet. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I agree technically. Though I suspect it /may/ be problematic with the |
| 5 |
spirit behind / motivating the ban on IP. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> You could possible use: |
| 8 |
> raw ethernet frames |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Do you have any recommendations of utilities for each side? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> netbeui |
| 13 |
> samba |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I thought that Samba has *LONG* been NetBIOS over TCP/IP (a.k.a. NBT). |
| 16 |
Is NetBEUI code /still/ in Samba? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> ethertalk (appletalk) |
| 19 |
> http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/ |
| 20 |
> ipx (netware) |
| 21 |
> ftp://ftp.koansoftware.com/public/opensource/mars_nwe/mars_nwe-0.99.pl21.tgz |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I believe that IPX support has been removed from 4.<something> kernels. |
| 24 |
Maybe 5.<something>. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
DECnet Phase III or Phase IV. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> I have previously (in the 90's) used mars, worked great. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I've never run MARS but I've done more than a little with Novell |
| 31 |
NetWare. I recently had a 4.14 kernel mount an NCPFS from a server. |
| 32 |
(4.14 obviously still has IPX.) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Grant. . . . |
| 38 |
unix || die |
Archives