1 |
On Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2008, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote: |
2 |
> > -----Original Message----- |
3 |
> > From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:weigelt@×××××.de] |
4 |
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 4:00 PM |
5 |
> > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
6 |
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia users: please sign petition for |
7 |
> > open/free drivers |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > * Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
10 |
> > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:33:36 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote: |
11 |
> > > > Keeping in mind that this petition probably might not work, I |
12 |
> |
13 |
> think |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > > > it's a good idea to let Nvidia know how many people are interested |
16 |
> |
17 |
> in |
18 |
> |
19 |
> > > > having free drivers. This might lead them to release information |
20 |
> |
21 |
> on |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > how |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > > > to write drivers for their hardware. |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > The problem with this is that Nvidia license non-free code for use |
28 |
> |
29 |
> in |
30 |
> |
31 |
> > > their drivers. They are not allowed to distribute the source, or |
32 |
> |
33 |
> other |
34 |
> |
35 |
> > > information about the code, so they have two choices for Linux |
36 |
> |
37 |
> drivers: |
38 |
> > They could rewrite it step by step and release the rewritten parts |
39 |
> > to the community. At least the kernel module, it doesn't seem to be |
40 |
> > that complex (compared with the open code around it). |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > cu |
43 |
> > -- |
44 |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
45 |
> > Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
46 |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
47 |
> > Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
48 |
> > http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
49 |
> > Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
50 |
> > http://patches.metux.de/ |
51 |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
52 |
> > -- |
53 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
54 |
> |
55 |
> It's ridiculous. I don't see how they will lose by providing documents |
56 |
> on how to write drivers for their hardware. This is a simple solution |
57 |
> that would not even involve them if they just gave us the specs. They |
58 |
> have nothing to gain but disgruntled customers by locking people out of |
59 |
> things they own. |
60 |
|
61 |
not the hardware specs are important, the errata are important. Just ask the |
62 |
guys who wrote the open radeon drivers back then. They fighted with a lot of |
63 |
bugs, hardware bugs, that were never mentioned in 'the specs'. |
64 |
|
65 |
And if you have enough foreign IP in your hardware you can not just open the |
66 |
documentation. You might want to ask a lawyer about it. Since you have an |
67 |
unisys adress it should be easy for you to find one who might want to explain |
68 |
to you the finer details of 'licence agreements' and all the traps and |
69 |
problems around them. |
70 |
-- |
71 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |