| 1 |
On Saturday 14 February 2015 12:56:09 bitlord wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:33:49 +0000 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hello list, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne |
| 8 |
> > to me: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > $ alias perl-cleaner |
| 11 |
> > alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg |
| 12 |
> > --jobs=3 --keep-going' $ perl-cleaner |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > ******************************************************************** |
| 15 |
> > ******* You are supplying additional command line options for the |
| 16 |
> > package manager. This is NOT RECOMMENDED, not tested, and may lead |
| 17 |
> > to incorrect, incomplete, confusing, and/or nonfunctional results. |
| 18 |
> > You are on your own now. |
| 19 |
> > ******************************************************************** |
| 20 |
> > ******* |
| 21 |
> You are using something which is not recommended by developers, that |
| 22 |
> is '-- <extra portage parameters>', telling perl-cleaner to pass |
| 23 |
> additional package manager parameters, not sure why is not |
| 24 |
> recommended, but it warns you, also in 'perl-cleaner --help' or man |
| 25 |
> page it says it is not recommended to do that. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> There is probably case when you can do something wrong, but also it |
| 28 |
> can be safe too passing some parameters which don't affect build like |
| 29 |
> '--ask'. One case which may be problematic (or not, just guessing) is |
| 30 |
> --jobs=N, what will happen if one perl module depend on the other, and |
| 31 |
> they are building at the same time? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Then portage will sort them out according to dependencies, as usual. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Rgds |
| 37 |
Peter. |
Archives