1 |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:15:32PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Ashley Dixon wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Especially considering most Americans do not understand the system (the |
5 |
> > readability of the I.R.S. tax code has been under scrutiny for a long time), |
6 |
> > I wouldn't want to place the burden of conferring with such a convoluted |
7 |
> > system on anyone. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I read a article once several years ago where a magazine contacted the |
10 |
> IRS and gave the same set of facts and asked the same question of over a |
11 |
> dozen different IRS help agents. You know, the ones that answer the |
12 |
> phone to help you. Given the same facts and the same question, they got |
13 |
> several different answers. It seems even the people at the IRS can't |
14 |
> understand it either. |
15 |
|
16 |
I did a quick on-line search regarding this matter (and readability of English |
17 |
texts in general), and it seems like the I.R.S. tax code is incapable of |
18 |
achieving even a positive score on the Flesch readability index [1, 2], so your |
19 |
testimonial doesn't surprise me too much. |
20 |
|
21 |
The same algorithm has been applied to a quite a few public domain works in |
22 |
Literature and Philosophy over the last few centuries; some of the results are |
23 |
mildly interesting [3]. Although, considering Finnegans Wake attained a score of |
24 |
62.8, I am dubious of the accuracy of this method (then again, it's very non- |
25 |
standard English, if you can call it English at all) [4]. |
26 |
|
27 |
[1] http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~jdalbey/305/Projects/FleschReadabilityProject.html |
28 |
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_tests |
29 |
[3] http://www.infomotions.com/etexts/ |
30 |
[4] https://www.statslife.org.uk/culture/1572-how-unreadable-are-james-joyce-s-novels |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
|
34 |
Ashley Dixon |
35 |
suugaku.co.uk |
36 |
|
37 |
2A9A 4117 |
38 |
DA96 D18A |
39 |
8A7B B0D2 |
40 |
A30E BF25 |
41 |
F290 A8AA |