1 |
Am 26.10.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Peter Humphrey: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I keep the portage tree under /usr-bits. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> # dmesg | grep sdb3 |
6 |
> [ 1.753508] sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4 < sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 sdb8 sdb9 > |
7 |
> [ 4.833460] EXT4-fs (sdb3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: |
8 |
> (null) |
9 |
> [ 107.205918] EXT4-fs (sdb3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: |
10 |
> (null) |
11 |
> |
12 |
> You can see the successful mount at 4.8 s; the entry at 107 s is me mounting |
13 |
> it again manually. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I've rewritten the partition label, and I've run a smartctl test which |
16 |
> reported no faults found. I've also just reduced the speed of the chipset, |
17 |
> which has three settings: good performance, better performance and turbo. It |
18 |
> adopts the turbo setting by default and I've now set it to "better". It's too |
19 |
> early yet to see if that will help. |
20 |
|
21 |
interesting ... |
22 |
|
23 |
What init-system? openrc or systemd? |
24 |
No trace of the actual unmount in any logs? |
25 |
|
26 |
Maybe also look/grep for the LABEL of the fs. |
27 |
|
28 |
Maybe test if using the device-name itself ( /dev/sdb3 ) or the UUID in |
29 |
fstab changes the behavior. |
30 |
|
31 |
I use UUIDs here without problems (with systemd). |