| 1 |
On Thu, 10 May 2007 00:21:06 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > You could also argue that /usr needs the least protection from |
| 4 |
> > filesystem damage, because it contains no data. /usr can be repaired |
| 5 |
> > with a reinstall, unlike /var, /home or /etc. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> That's a good point. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Only for the sake of arguing: those need no FS protection, but |
| 10 |
> recent back-ups :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Recent is never recent enough. I used to think daily backups were fine, |
| 13 |
until a failure at 5pm cost me a day's work :( |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Forget the Joneses...I can't keep up with The Simpsons. |
Archives