1 |
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:43:19 +0000 |
2 |
Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sunday 18 January 2009 00:25:49 »Q« wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > I also have a 1280x800 screen and uvesafb works for me without |
7 |
> > distortion with this kernel video option in grub.conf: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > video=uvesafb:1280x800-32,mtrr:3,ywrap |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Do you have that resolution available in your BIOS? I read somewhere |
12 |
> that uvesafb can only use what it finds in the BIOS; in my case there |
13 |
> is no such resolution. Maybe BIOS writers assume that nobody uses a |
14 |
> text screen these days. |
15 |
|
16 |
In the BIOS for my mainboard, there doesn't seem to be any mention of |
17 |
resolutions. But my video BIOS does support that resolution, at least |
18 |
according to what shows up in /sys/class/graphics/fb0/modes |
19 |
and /sys/bus/platform/drivers/uvesafb/uvesafb.0/vbe_modes |
20 |
|
21 |
And yeah, in the "Caveats and Limitations" section of |
22 |
linux/Documentation/fb/uvesafb.txt , spock does make it clear that |
23 |
uvesafb can only use modes supported by the video BIOS. I don't think |
24 |
I could live with that -- I'd go back to vesafb if it didn't WFM. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
»Q« |
29 |
Kleeneness is next to Gödelness. |