Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:55:23
Message-Id: 1308847923.3979.3.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance by Matthew Finkel
1 On Thursday, June 23 at 12:32 (-0400), Matthew Finkel said:
2
3 > On 06/23/11 07:15, Albert Hopkins wrote:
4 > >
5 > > On Thursday, June 23 at 00:35 (-0400), Matthew Finkel said:
6 > >
7 > >> Oh, don't get me wrong, that's one reason I use qcow2 myself, but it's
8 > >> either something he would have to deal with when he received it or the
9 > >> conversion would increase the size of the disk image that would be
10 > >> shipped to him.
11 > > Yes, of course a raw image file will typically be bigger than a
12 > > compressed qcow, just as an unpacked stage4..tar.bz2 file is going to be
13 > > bigger than the original archive. But in terms transferability,
14 > > compressed qcows are more efficient since they only include *used*
15 > > blocks and they are compressed. I can convert the image into any of a
16 > > number of formats, but the issue then is it will be bigger, and thus
17 > > take me longer to upload it and the OP to download it
18 > Yup, exactly :-)
19 >
20
21 I've uploaded a (390MB) vmdk. I've been told by someone that it works
22 with vmware (not sure what version).
23
24 This was build just a few minutes ago with the latest stage3 tarball and
25 the latest portage snapshot.
26
27 http://starship.python.net/crew/marduk/base.vmdk
28
29 The root password is blank. It will force you to change it on first
30 login.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org>