From: | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? | ||
Date: | Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:44:22 | ||
Message-Id: | 50E0C369.6030207@orlitzky.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? by Walter Dnes |
1 | On 12/29/2012 01:32 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: |
2 | > Two questions I'm not sure about. |
3 | > |
4 | > 1) I run a desktop, and use passive ftp. Is there any need for me to |
5 | > accept RELATED packets? |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | Probably not, I think the server needs it though. |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | > 2) Does a "-j LOG" return to the chain it was called from, or does it do |
12 | > an implicit DROP? |
13 | > |
14 | |
15 | It returns to spot where it was called from. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? | Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> |