Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda?
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:01:02
Message-Id: 20070711095108.26fac599@pascal.spore.ath.cx
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda? by Alexander Skwar
1 On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:01:44 +0200
2 Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > What do I have to do, so that the drive is fast in kernel 2.6.22 as
6 > well?
7 >
8 > I'm booting the 2.6.22 kernel with this entry in grub menu.lst:
9 >
10 > ,----[ kernel 2.6.22 ]
11 > | title Gentoo GNU/Linux (zuletzt gebauter Kernel mit hda)
12 > | root (hd0,2)
13 > | kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/hda6 lapic libata.atapi_enabled=1
14 > | combined_mode=libata
15 > `----
16 >
17 > Kernel 2.6.21 is started with the following entry in grub:
18 >
19 > ,----[ kernel 2.6.21 ]
20 > | title Gentoo GNU/Linux (vorletzter gebauter Kernel)
21 > | root (hd0,2)
22 > | kernel /vmlinuz.old root=/dev/sda6 lapic
23 > | libata.atapi_enabled=1 combined_mode=libata
24 > `----
25 >
26 > Thanks,
27 >
28 > Alexander Skwar
29 >
30 Have you considered trying with those ata kernel params turned off?
31 You seem to know what you're doing, but I use no such parameters and
32 haven't any problems.
33 --
34 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda? Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name>
[gentoo-user] Re: Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda? Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name>