1 |
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 18:57:25 schrieb Alan Mackenzie: |
2 |
> Hi, Canek. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:22:44PM -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
5 |
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote: |
6 |
> > >> > However, I use lprng, not cups. It's good that we have a |
7 |
> > >> > choice over what software we use, isn't it? ;-( |
8 |
> > >> |
9 |
> > >> It could be that IPP is just becoming the preferred protocol, and |
10 |
> > >> other print queue managing protocols are going the way of Gopher. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Preferred by whom? Firefox, for example, manages lprng just fine. |
13 |
> > > It's really not a big deal supporting an extra spooler interface, |
14 |
> > > particularly a simple one. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Because, as "simple" as it could be, it's another one. Big projects |
17 |
> > need to support CUPS, because they need to work for everyone (or as |
18 |
> > many as possible). It makes no sense *at all* to support more printing |
19 |
> > systems. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> It enables more people to use it. |
22 |
|
23 |
Yes. that's you and...? |
24 |
All binary distros use cups for printing. I would think, most gentoo users do |
25 |
the same. The BSDs, I know of, use cups. MacOS uses it. It works for Windows- |
26 |
Clients. There are IPP-Servers for Windows. What was your argument again? |
27 |
|
28 |
> The support for lpr exists. It's being removed, for some reason. Given |
29 |
> that printing works by constructing a postscript equivalent of the thing |
30 |
> being printed, just how difficult can it be to squirt this postscript |
31 |
> down lpr rather than the cups equivalent? How long does it take to write |
32 |
> a C++ `if' statement? |
33 |
|
34 |
I get it. You have no idea how software development at such a large scale |
35 |
works. |
36 |
|
37 |
> > And again, it's Open Source. If there is enough demand, someone will |
38 |
> > write support for other printing systems. Just don't assume that any |
39 |
> > project (being LibreOffice or Gentoo) need to support your choices |
40 |
> > besides the most used one. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Again the code already exists, it's merely a matter of not destroying it. |
43 |
|
44 |
This code needs to be supported and maintained for literally no good reason. |
45 |
If you think, that's no work at all, just volunteer for the task. |
46 |
|
47 |
> I became a user based on it supporting a standard printing system, and |
48 |
> it's perfectly reasonable for me to expect that support to continue. |
49 |
|
50 |
No, it's not, unless you are willing to do the additional work. |
51 |
|
52 |
Michael |