Archives
Archives
| From: | Bill Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] VMs - what technology would you advise? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 31 Dec 2014 14:10:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 54A403A1.6030206@iinet.net.au | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] VMs - what technology would you advise? by Mick |
||
| 1 | On 31/12/14 21:26, Mick wrote: |
| 2 | > On Wednesday 31 Dec 2014 12:47:55 Sid S wrote: |
| 3 | >> Yes, in favor of KVM. |
| 4 | >> |
| 5 | >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_haswell_virtualiza |
| 6 | >> tion http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1404_kvmboxt |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Vbox seems to be coming last by quite some margin in the intel tests! I also |
| 9 | > read this article and it looks that vbox is thankfully doing better on AMD; |
| 10 | > but there are differences in the versions and kernels used between the two |
| 11 | > articles: |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1204_virt&num=1 |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | |
| 16 | According to Google, VB includes a lot of qemu code ... I was told way |
| 17 | back that it was (once) based on qemu. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | BillK |