| 1 |
On Thursday 15 March 2007, Patrice Bouvard wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:57:04 +0200, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> a écrit : |
| 5 |
> > don't want to have to keep editing resolv.conf |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Then, don't edit it every time you change network. Just keep it with |
| 8 |
> a lot of entries. If one doesn't work, the next one will be used. |
| 9 |
> Name resolution could be a little bit slow with a lot of entries and |
| 10 |
> only the last one working. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Is there any problem to this kind of configuration ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes, the resolver will only ever use the first three name servers and |
| 15 |
will give up if they all fail, regardless of how many entries are in |
| 16 |
the file. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
| 20 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
| 21 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 24 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
| 25 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives