Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: allan gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] trusting perl-cleaner
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 23:39:03
Message-Id: 87tw5nvs6v.fsf@nyu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] trusting perl-cleaner by Alan McKinnon
1 On Sun, Apr 16 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > On 17/04/2017 01:07, allan gottlieb wrote:
4 >> Am I correct in believing that when perl-cleaner --all, at the end of a
5 >> run, asserts
6 >>
7 >> * It seems like perl-cleaner had to rebuild some packages.
8 >> *
9 >> * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
10 >> * or edited.
11 >> * /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.22.2/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini :
12 >> * known, can be deleted
13 >> * /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.20.2/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini :
14 >> * known, can be deleted
15 >>
16 >> the correct response is to trust it and delete the file?
17 >
18 >
19 > In those specific cases, yes.
20 >
21 > ParserDetails.ini is one of those perl files that do get modified during
22 > the normal operation of the perl code.
23 > perl-cleaner is being smart and telling you the file is not the same as
24 > when it was installed, so it leaves the deletion up to you.
25 >
26 > Your current perl is neither 5.20.2 nor 5.22.2, those .ini files will
27 > now never be used and so they are safe to delete.
28 >
29 > Side note: you can't always just delete everything in that section of
30 > perl-cleaner output. Often, the script can't tell what it is and the
31 > module was not put there by portage, so you must decide what to d on a
32 > case by case basis.
33
34 Thank you.
35 allan