| 1 |
On 25/02/12 16:48, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2012-02-25, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 24/02/12 17:35, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 2012-02-24, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On 24/02/12 07:02, pk wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> On 2012-02-24 05:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>>>> user can watch. Flash on the other hand guarantees web designers that a |
| 9 |
>>>>>> PC user can watch their videos. Having a guarantee that something works |
| 10 |
>>>>>> is a very powerful incentive; you do not abandon something that works. |
| 11 |
>>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>>> It's only guaranteed if flash is installed. HTML5 is pretty much |
| 13 |
>>>>> "guaranteed" with current browsers. |
| 14 |
>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>> Flash has about 95% coverage. |
| 16 |
>>>> That means virtually everyone has it installed. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> That's hard to believe. The number of iPads and and iPhones out there |
| 19 |
>>> is getting pretty high, and they don't have flash and never will. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> In PCs, not other machines. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Why the restriction to PCs? Web designers and website owners don't |
| 24 |
> care about PCs. They care about browsers and eyballs. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
PC users have browsers. 95% of those browsers have Flash. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I think this is pretty easy to understand. Perhaps it's a language |
| 29 |
barrier and I have trouble expressing myself clearly? |
Archives