1 |
On Monday, November 12, 2018 7:24:11 AM CET Dale wrote: |
2 |
> J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sunday, November 11, 2018 11:07:23 PM CET Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> So, I wanted a stand alone scanner that I hope will last me a long |
5 |
> >> time. Plus, this scanner can do negatives and such with a adapter which |
6 |
> >> I can get later. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I tried that once, the quality of the results was really bad. I ended up |
9 |
> > borrowing a proper negative-scanner from a colleague. That was a |
10 |
> > windows-only one, but the quality of the scans more than made up for |
11 |
> > having to use that. (And using VirtualBox, I got better performance, eg. |
12 |
> > scanspeed, than when using windows native) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I have to admit, I have very little negatives. The ones I have may be |
15 |
> so old they are not worth anything. I tend to take better care of pics |
16 |
> than negatives for some reason. Still, as long as the scanner will give |
17 |
> me several years of service, I'll be happy. I just don't want a |
18 |
> scanner/printer pile with only parts of each one working. I don't have |
19 |
> enough room as it is. lol |
20 |
|
21 |
Same here, which is why I was glad a colleague had one I could borrow. |
22 |
Ran through the whole collection in 4 weeks (evenings) and no need to do it |
23 |
again. |
24 |
|
25 |
> >> Also, I plan to get a color laser printer later on. |
26 |
> >> From what I've read, they can last for many years and it's cheaper for |
27 |
> >> the toner than all those cartridges etc for ink jets. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > I got a colour laser all-in-one, it's nearly 8 years old and not had any |
30 |
> > problems with it. Would like to replace it for a double-sided (print and |
31 |
> > scan) version though. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Just curious, are there any good or bad brands to avoid? I've tried to |
34 |
> stick with HP for scanners/printers since they are usually supported, |
35 |
> but not always. |
36 |
|
37 |
I never had driver issues with HP, so tend to stick with them. |
38 |
|
39 |
> >> Now if someone local wanted to give me something that is like a fancy |
40 |
> >> copy machine that prints, scans and maybe even washes dishes, I'd take |
41 |
> >> it. I'm not sure where I would put it but still. ;-) |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > Try old office buildings, they do remove them as cost-saving exercises on |
44 |
> > occasion, you might be able to pick one up? (you do have a big |
45 |
> > car/van/truck to move it?) |
46 |
> |
47 |
> I have a friend that has one. I have one but need to get it running |
48 |
> again. Starter, radiator and a couple other issues to deal with. |
49 |
> Starter is the first hurdle tho. |
50 |
|
51 |
Had to think this through a few times. As we're talking about printer/ |
52 |
scanners, I was wondering what kind of beast has a starter and radiator... |
53 |
|
54 |
> >> One thing I've figured out. Cheaper on the front end, pay for it on the |
55 |
> >> backend. Pay a little more on the front end, more dependable and |
56 |
> >> cheaper later on consumables. Hey, at least I'm figuring it out. lol |
57 |
> > |
58 |
> > It's a hard lesson to learn, but once learned, it sticks. :) |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > -- |
61 |
> > Joost |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > PS. glad your mom is doing fine |
64 |
> |
65 |
> Yep. I've also learned that the more heads, usually the better plan. |
66 |
> That's why I have that other thread about storing all my videos. Geez, |
67 |
> I got a TON of videos. If I started watching them 24/7, it would take |
68 |
> me about 2 years to get through them all. I'm adding to them quite often. |
69 |
|
70 |
You're going off-list for 2 years? |
71 |
|
72 |
-- |
73 |
Joost |