1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Well, one reason I use gtkam is that I can rename the pics as it |
3 |
> transfers them over. I date code mine and sometimes add other hints to |
4 |
> the name. If I just copy them over from the card reader, it uses the |
5 |
> same name as the camera uses and that doesn't let me keep track as I |
6 |
> like too. I may see if digikam will import from the card reader thingy |
7 |
> tho. That *may* work. Still prefer to plug in my camera tho. Thanks. |
8 |
> Dale :-) :-) |
9 |
|
10 |
OK. I can get digikam to import from the card with a reader thingy. It |
11 |
took me a while, some hair pulling, a few threats of using a hammer but |
12 |
I got it to name them like I want. So, in the meantime I can get my |
13 |
pics. Thing is, to get to my card, I have to about disassemble the |
14 |
camera. I have to remove the mount for the tri-pod, the bottom and the |
15 |
battery to get it out. Well, it gives me a good excuse to charge the |
16 |
battery. Thing lasts for months on a charge tho. That battery is |
17 |
really long lasting. |
18 |
|
19 |
I still want to get gtkam fixed tho. It's much faster and simpler for |
20 |
me. Digikam has lots of bells and whistles I don't need. |
21 |
|
22 |
Dale |
23 |
|
24 |
:-) :-) |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
P. S. For everyone else, never a crash or problem reading the card in |
28 |
the card reader thingy using the exact same cable. Worked like a |
29 |
charm. It seems USB just does not like cameras. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |