1 |
On 21 January 2006 16:50, Holly Bostick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> That's not the point, which is where we have a failure to communicate. |
4 |
> Openbox and FVWM-crystal (and ICEwm, for that matter) are lighter, |
5 |
> faster desktops than KDE partially because they do not contain the code |
6 |
> to put icons on the desktop (whether I enable it in KDE or not). |
7 |
|
8 |
Unused code does *not* slow down an application. It's just, well, ... |
9 |
unused. ;-) |
10 |
|
11 |
> If I |
12 |
> suddenly change my mind and want icons on my desktop, I have to install |
13 |
> idesk or something. That's the way (unh-huh, unh-huh) I *like* it. If I |
14 |
> want an application to perform a function that I want or need, then I |
15 |
> install it. If I don't want or need the functionality, it *is not present*. |
16 |
|
17 |
Frankly, I don't believe you. Some other part in your post indicates you use |
18 |
nano as an editor. Are you seriously claiming you have *ever* used all |
19 |
features (all the code) of nano? How about "-p"? Or "-l"? Is the |
20 |
corresponding code excluded from your nano? |
21 |
|
22 |
How about all the features (all the code) of cp? How about "-l", "--parents" |
23 |
and "-x", ever used them? If not so, is the corresponding code excluded from |
24 |
your cp? I won't even start to talk about tar of bash. |
25 |
|
26 |
I see that you use Thunderbird as your MTU. Does it support authenticating to |
27 |
the MTA when sending mail? Do you use that? Does it suport both POP3 and |
28 |
IMAP? Do you use both? Is the unused code excluded from your Thunderbird? |
29 |
|
30 |
Almost no user will use all code in any non-trivial application (and yes, cp |
31 |
is non-trivial). What are developers to do about it? Make cp modular so that |
32 |
a user can decide at compile time what features they will use five month from |
33 |
now? Even a very small text-only linux installation contains a couple of |
34 |
hundred executables. You got to be kidding! |
35 |
|
36 |
[ snip ] |
37 |
|
38 |
> A lot of people care about this, both users and developers; It's a |
39 |
> little issue known as User Interface Consistency, which people seem to |
40 |
> find very important for new and/or inexperienced users (for experienced |
41 |
> users it's more of an ongoing annoyance than a show-stopper, I think). |
42 |
> Certainly programs exist to resolve that, both KDE and GNOME developers |
43 |
> spend time migrating to the freedesktop.org standard to resolve that and |
44 |
> users ask questions on this and other forums asking how to resolve at |
45 |
> least the presenting visual issues. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Myself, I generally try to solve the issue by sticking to one toolset, |
48 |
> but that is not always possible. And it is annoying... if I use |
49 |
> Krusader, and want to show hidden files in my home folder, the command |
50 |
> or menu item to do that is in a different place than where it is in |
51 |
> Nautilus or another GTK-toolset file manager or file browser for |
52 |
> open/save dialogs. That means I have to *stop what I'm actually doing* |
53 |
> (viewing my files) and think about which fm I'm using and remember that |
54 |
> this one does it this way (as opposed to the one I usually use) and then |
55 |
> go back to what I'm doing. It interrupts the seamless flow of your task, |
56 |
> and people object to that to a greater or lesser degree, depending on |
57 |
> how much interruption they can support before the task becomes |
58 |
> unperformable, or more difficult to perform than the task is worth. |
59 |
|
60 |
These two paragraphs, of course, are very good, though not all, arguments |
61 |
*for* DEs. As a computer user (and software developer), I go back to the |
62 |
famous ZX-81 when it was new. (Those who do not know it google for it!) |
63 |
Nonetheless, consistent menus, dialogues, ... speed me up in using |
64 |
applications - especially apps I don't use that often. I do admit that KDE |
65 |
hasn't reached that goal completely yet. For example, some applications show |
66 |
"Configure This-app" as the first entry under "Settings", others as the last |
67 |
one. I am pretty sure similar examples can be found in the GNOME world. |
68 |
Still, both DEs are far better in this regard than any wild mix of xpdf, |
69 |
xterm, OpenOffice, GIMP, xmms and 700 other UIs. |
70 |
|
71 |
Uwe |
72 |
|
73 |
-- |
74 |
Unix is sexy: |
75 |
who | grep -i blonde | date |
76 |
cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger |
77 |
mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount |
78 |
sleep |
79 |
-- |
80 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |