Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:13:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110623130953.6eab58cd@zaphod.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Dale |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:49:45 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > > My question was why are you installing cantor if you don't need it? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > Oh, I see. It was pulled in by kde-meta. I know I can have KDE other |
| 6 | > ways but it is much easier to emerge kde-meta than to emerge < some |
| 7 | > huge amount of packages >. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | If you consider spending a couple of days farting around with fortran to |
| 10 | be "much easier"... :P |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Walk softly and carry a fully charged phazer. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |