Archives
Archives
| From: | Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libtool problem | ||
| Date: | Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:20:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200902041917.38293.dirk.heinrichs@online.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: libtool problem by ABCD |
||
| 1 | Am Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2009 04:25:34 schrieb ABCD: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The reason there wasn't a bump (IIRC) was that the ebuild never changed |
| 4 | > - only the eclass did. If you emerged any version of GCC during the |
| 5 | > window where the eclass was broken, that version of GCC would have been |
| 6 | > broken. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | That also means that portage is broken. Whenever something changes where other |
| 9 | things depend on, those other things should be rebuilt. This doesn't happen |
| 10 | here. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Bye... |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Dirk |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libtool problem | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |