Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: R'twick Niceorgaw <rtwick-gentoo@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] evolution 2.4 inline pgp sign/encrypt support ?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:50:56
Message-Id: 1127389297.11604.4.camel@utkalika.homedns.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] evolution 2.4 inline pgp sign/encrypt support ? by gentuxx
1 On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 11:11 -0700, gentuxx wrote:
2 > I used to be a die-hard evolution user, but then something I emerged
3 > and/or updated broke all of the icons in the display, so I stopped
4 > using it. (Seems fixed now, though, I just checked ;-) ) Anyhow, I
5 > suspect that this is more likely a function of the recipient. I sent
6 > a signed test message to a couple gmail accounts, one is received by
7 > Outlook through the POP interface, and also this account (which is
8 > normally viewed using Thunderbird). I didn't receive the msg sent to
9 > this account, so I can't be sure (seems to be a quirk of Thunderbird,
10 > and possibly Kmail), but the message received by Outlook had the
11 > signature attached. The message in the gmail web interface to this
12 > account, was signed inline.
13 >
14 I sent a message to gmail as well as another imap a/c and it seems gmail
15 shows the attached signature along with the message. Its not inline.
16 I sent an inline signed message from another client and in evolution 2.4
17 it displayed it correctly, however in 2.2.3, it didn't display it
18 corectly.
19 So my guess is, evolution 2.4 has support to read inline
20 signed/encrypted messages properly but no support to sign/encrypt
21 inline.
22
23 -R'twick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature