Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: forgottenwizard <phrexianreaper@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Am I wrong?..
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:30:42
Message-Id: 9bdfeacb73e03d9a99811a5047a44626@smtp.hushmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Am I wrong?.. by "Sebastian Beßler"
1 On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 11:21:08AM +0200, Sebastian Be?ler wrote:
2 > Am 02.10.2009 11:04, schrieb forgottenwizard:
3 >
4 > > The number of USE flags would be quite impressive for such a small
5 > > package.
6 >
7 > a "vanilla"-flag could be possible that disables every changes to the
8 > upstream-package.
9 >
10 > It even exists atm for a number of packages
11 >
12 > metatron@DarkStation ~ $ euse -i vanilla
13 > global use flags (searching: vanilla)
14 > ************************************************************
15 > [- ] vanilla - Do not add extra patches which change default
16 > behaviour; DO NOT USE THIS ON A GLOBAL SCALE as the severity of the
17 > meaning changes drastically
18 >
19 > Greetings
20 >
21 > Sebastian
22 >
23 >
24 >
25
26 <insert emacs user whining>
27
28 Thats an option, but seems to be a poor one. All that will do is let you
29 use either vi(m) or nano for the default, which for emacs users will be
30 no diffrent than the current problem.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Am I wrong?.. "Sebastian Beßler" <webmaster@××××××××××××.de>