Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker.

[Michael Mol]

On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Dmitry Goncharov
<dgoncharov@××××××××.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:56:01PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov
>> <dgoncharov@××××××××.net> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
>> >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible.
>> >>
>> >> This is repeatable for me.
>> >>
>> > <snip>
>> >>  * The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named
>> >>  * 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys-
>> >>
>> > <snip>
>> >> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf
>> >> --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param
>> >> l2-cache-size=4096 -mtune=core2 -ggdb3"
>> >> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
>> >
>> > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15?
>>
>> Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall.
>>
>> > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if the
>> > problem persists?
>>
>> Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to:
>> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=native".
>>
>> But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=native.
>>
>> > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you can build
>> > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass.
>>
>> If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline
>> for almost two months from this.
>>
>> --
>> :wq
>>
> Also, which gcc are you using? Can you try a different version?

It updated gcc immediately before glibc, IIRC, so I expect it's newest
stable. Kaylee is offline until I do a new reinstall again, but it
looks like latest stable in portage is 4.5.3-r2.

-- 
:wq