| 1 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On 4/19/06, Michael Sullivan <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>We did it in the correct order. He's rebooted into Linux (sans LiveCD) |
| 7 |
>>and says he has network. I'd still like to know how |
| 8 |
>>if /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is pointing to /etc/init.d/net.eth0, how does |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>AFAIK both net.eth0 and net.eth1 should be symbolic links to net.lo. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/2006.0/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=1 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>The handbook has a slight gramattical error in the description, but |
| 17 |
>the command given: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> ln -s net.lo net.eth0 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>will create a symbolic link named net.eth0 pointing at net.lo. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>-Richard |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
The scripts are the same, but they use different parts of the config files. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
BTW: disregard my previous post i hadn't seen the problem was fixed |
| 30 |
(it's late here). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Maxime |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives