1 |
On Dec 15, 2007 6:55 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I just did an "emerge --sync", and checked what was available for |
4 |
> updateing... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> [m3000][root][~] emerge --ask --deep --update --world |
7 |
> |
8 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Calculating world dependencies... done! |
11 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20070724 [20070118] |
12 |
> [ebuild U ] dev-libs/libassuan-1.0.2-r1 [0.6.10] |
13 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gettext-0.17 [0.16.1-r1] |
14 |
> [ebuild U ] dev-util/dialog-1.1.20071028 [1.1.20070930] |
15 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/com_err-1.40.3 [1.40.2] |
16 |
> [ebuild U ] www-client/w3m-0.5.2-r1 [0.5.2] |
17 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/ss-1.40.3 [1.40.2] |
18 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.40.3 [1.40.2] |
19 |
> [ebuild U ] net-firewall/iptables-1.3.8-r2 [1.3.8-r1] |
20 |
> [ebuild U ] x11-apps/xinit-1.0.5-r1 [1.0.4] USE="-hal% -pam%" |
21 |
> [ebuild N ] app-crypt/pinentry-0.7.3 USE="ncurses -caps -gtk -qt3" |
22 |
> [ebuild U ] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7 [1.4.7-r1] USE="-doc% -openct% |
23 |
> -pcsc-lite%" |
24 |
> [blocks B ] <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 (is blocking app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7 |
25 |
> ) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I do *NOT* have *ANY* packages masked in /etc/portage/package.mask |
28 |
> Anyhow, I manually unmerged gnupg (would you believe version 1.4.7-r1 ?), |
29 |
> and asked for an update again... |
30 |
> |
31 |
> [m3000][root][~] emerge --ask --deep --update --world |
32 |
> |
33 |
> These are the packages that would be fetched, in order: |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Calculating world dependencies... done! |
36 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20070724 [20070118] |
37 |
> [ebuild U ] dev-libs/libassuan-1.0.2-r1 [0.6.10] |
38 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gettext-0.17 [0.16.1-r1] |
39 |
> [ebuild U ] dev-util/dialog-1.1.20071028 [1.1.20070930] |
40 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/com_err-1.40.3 [1.40.2] |
41 |
> [ebuild U ] www-client/w3m-0.5.2-r1 [0.5.2] |
42 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/ss-1.40.3 [1.40.2] |
43 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.40.3 [1.40.2] |
44 |
> [ebuild U ] net-firewall/iptables-1.3.8-r2 [1.3.8-r1] |
45 |
> [ebuild U ] x11-apps/xinit-1.0.5-r1 [1.0.4] USE="-hal% -pam%" |
46 |
> [ebuild N ] app-crypt/pinentry-0.7.3 USE="ncurses -caps -gtk -qt3" |
47 |
> [ebuild N ] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7 USE="bzip2 -doc -ldap -nls -openct |
48 |
> -pcsc-lite (-selinux) -smartcard" |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Curious minds want to know... |
51 |
> |
52 |
> - why didn't portage replace the old version itself? That's generally |
53 |
> part of the update process. |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
Probably because for some package a DEPEND was set to something like: |
57 |
>=gnupg-2.0.7 |
58 |
|
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
> - once I manually unmerged gnupg, what brings it back? I did *NOT* |
62 |
> use revdep-rebuild. |
63 |
|
64 |
A package on your system needs gnupg as a dependency. |
65 |
|
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
> - what's with the additional flags for 2.0.7 compared to what 2.0.7 |
69 |
> had the previous time I tried? |
70 |
|
71 |
Some flags were added it to allow for more customization of gnupg is my |
72 |
guess. |
73 |
|
74 |
Good questions! |
75 |
|
76 |
> |
77 |
> |
78 |
> -- |
79 |
> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
80 |
> I'm not repeating myself |
81 |
> I'm an X Window user... I'm an ex-Windows-user |
82 |
> -- |
83 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
84 |
> |
85 |
> |