1 |
On Saturday 27 December 2014 09:57:09 Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 27 Dec 2014 09:43:47 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
3 |
> > No doubt this is just as silly an idea as building KMail without its |
4 |
> > database, which also has caused considerable grief. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Peter, I can't advise on the Activities question, but can you please tell |
7 |
> me how you managed to build Kmail without its database? Is it fully |
8 |
> functional? |
9 |
|
10 |
I didn't realise I was being ambiguous - sorry. As far as I know, it's |
11 |
impossible to build KMail without its database. It's called progress. ;-) |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Rgds |
15 |
Peter. |