1 |
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> If there were some kind of trade-off I'd see the argument, but the |
5 |
>> worst case here is just that they may or may not need it. For |
6 |
>> something with some benefit and almost no drawback that seems like a |
7 |
>> wrong reason to avoid LVM. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Sure, it may help a very tiny percentage of people but I suspect it will |
11 |
> be tiny. Mostly, for the same reasons I pointed out in another reply on |
12 |
> this thread. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
IMO the important question isn't how many it helps, but how many it hurts. |
16 |
|
17 |
If it helps a tiny number, and it hurts none, then it is a worthwhile default. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Rich |