1 |
On 2015-10-15, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Why would I use a different smtp server if I'm now using imap? I use |
4 |
> smtp to send mail, and imap to read it, right? Why not use the same |
5 |
> smtp server in either case? |
6 |
|
7 |
The only thing I can imagine is that perhaps when you send via the |
8 |
"imap" smtp server, it saves a copy of the outbound mail in a "sent" |
9 |
IMAP folder. |
10 |
|
11 |
I've never actually seen a setup like that, and I doubt that's the |
12 |
real answer. |
13 |
|
14 |
> (The different server names actually resolve to the same IP address, so |
15 |
> the distinction seems to be more theoretical than real, but the theory |
16 |
> is what puzzles me.) |
17 |
|
18 |
Sounds like a normal low-level SNAFU to me... |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Can you MAIL a BEAN |
22 |
at CAKE? |
23 |
gmail.com |