1 |
Zhang Weiwu wrote: |
2 |
> Hello. I have got a lot (much more) ps files and PDF files since I start to |
3 |
> use Linux. In the past there were mostly doc files but now I always prefer |
4 |
> to have a PS or PDF copy to ease the compatibility pain. And looks linux |
5 |
> people always prefer to send me a PS or PDF document. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Because I always save two copies of every of my document, one in original |
8 |
> format (eg. odt) and another in printable format for my colleagues in case |
9 |
> they don't have the Linux fonts and software. Here comes the question should |
10 |
> I keep a PS copy or PDF copy. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I think PDF copy is absolutely the prefered format because: |
13 |
> * easier to find acrobat reader; |
14 |
> * can be 'Tagged', especially used with OOo; |
15 |
> * possibility to 'copy and paste', though format will be lost; |
16 |
> * not to take other people by surprise with unfamiliar PS extension; |
17 |
> * different quanlity: I can save PDF in very high quanlity that I was told |
18 |
> "can be taken to press house" |
19 |
> * easy to convert to PS format when needed. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Here comes the question: if the above all stands true, why do I ever need PS |
22 |
> format at all? There might be some reasons to keep this format still |
23 |
> existing. Perhaps in other areas, other then office work. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> So the conclusion: for typical office workers, we can forget PS format. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Now welcome for suggestions. |
28 |
|
29 |
I think the key to this whole story is the second to last line above. |
30 |
"for typical office workers" says it all. I think you are quite right to |
31 |
say you can forget PS format. You could probably stick with pdf if you |
32 |
only need the documents for 2-5 years. PDF is very much industry |
33 |
standard for archiving, and isn't going away soon. |
34 |
I would *definitely* think about keeping documents (if you are going to |
35 |
go to the trouble of archiving and all that) in text format, probably |
36 |
xml like odt or even m$ xml, because if the data are valuable then |
37 |
finding something to read it in 50 years will probably be difficult. The |
38 |
EU is looking like it will go that way just like Massachusetts - no |
39 |
reason why you shouldn't either. You will ALWAYS be able to find or |
40 |
create a tool to get decently printed and onscreen presentation from |
41 |
well marked up plaintext. |
42 |
Cheers |
43 |
Antoine |
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |