From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? | ||
Date: | Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:55:43 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120218125414.7adcc7f3@digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? by Jacques Montier |
1 | On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it |
4 | > does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. |
5 | > I get "instruction not permitted". |
6 | > So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. |
7 | |
8 | It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. |
9 | |
10 | Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you |
11 | can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Neil Bothwick |
16 | |
17 | Your lack of organisation does not represent an |
18 | emergency in my world. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? | Nilesh Govindrajan <contact@××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? | Jacques Montier <jmontier@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |