1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:35:21 -0500, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> So my experience doesn't matter any then? My /usr does vary and |
5 |
>> sometimes varies quite a bit. That is why I had to resize the thing. |
6 |
>> Saying that I didn't make it large enough to begin with isn't the |
7 |
>> point. When people use LVM, the reason they use it is so that we can |
8 |
>> resize things when needed. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> On a desktop system, it is not unusual for /usr usage to vary, as you |
11 |
> install, and maybe remove, various packages as your needs change. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> As for not making it large enough to begin with, isn't one of the |
14 |
> advantages of using LVM that you don't need to try to guess future usage |
15 |
> and only need to make the LV large enough for today's needs. That's one |
16 |
> of the main reasons I used LVM, before The One True Way[tm] was available |
17 |
> on Linux. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Keep on using LVM if it is right for you, and it apparently is, but you |
20 |
> will have to compromise on using an initramfs to do so reliably in the |
21 |
> future. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I seriously recommend you look at the Wiki page on making your own |
24 |
> initramfs. One of the problems people have with them, and I was one of |
25 |
> them, is that they are a black box, a binary blob that does some magic to |
26 |
> get your system booted. Playing around with creating your own shows you |
27 |
> just how simple and basic they really are, a busybox binary and a couple |
28 |
> of lines of shell script to mount / and /usr. If you fear the unknown, |
29 |
> get to know it. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
I already did that. I'm pretty sure the first try was following a |
35 |
Gentoo wiki. It failed. I googled and I'm pretty sure I posted the |
36 |
error on here to, I never got it to work and as far as I know, no one |
37 |
had a fix either. I just know it didn't work. I then tried another |
38 |
wiki and it also failed but differently. I also tried doing the one |
39 |
with it built into the kernel, wouldn't boot then either. Dracut |
40 |
worked, at least I guess it did, but if it ever breaks, no clue what to |
41 |
do and if I can't boot, same boat again. I'm staring at a error with no |
42 |
clue how to fix it. |
43 |
|
44 |
The point is, whether with or without a init thingy, first failed boot |
45 |
that I can't readily fix, time to learn something else new. A computer |
46 |
that doesn't boot isn't of much use for me. |
47 |
|
48 |
Dale |
49 |
|
50 |
:-) :-) |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
54 |
how you interpreted my words! |