Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ?
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:11:41
Message-Id: CAGfcS_m4RcWZA2ZBU3M9VhaMJkO+L=PEb==x=rB7VjWx4w=Ekw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ? by Sid S
1 On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Sid S <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Hasufell, what are you referring to by attempts to make Gentoo more friendly
3 > to gaming?
4
5 You quoted an email that didn't refer to "attempts to make Gentoo more
6 friendly to gaming."
7
8 The reason that you should respond below quotes is so that readers can
9 review the discussion in context. Your question is out of context,
10 and top-quoted besides. You should also trim quotes that aren't
11 relevant.
12
13 Just a friendly request to try to bottom-quote in the future, and this
14 is part of why. Obviously replying to the correct email is better,
15 though bottom-quoting would help call your attention to the fact that
16 this mistake was made.
17
18 --
19 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ? Sid S <r030t1@×××××.com>