Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Strange portage behaviour
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:04:43
Message-Id: 1872433.usQuhbGJ8B@peak
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Strange portage behaviour by Peter Humphrey
1 On Monday, 3 August 2020 23:01:07 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
2 > On Monday, 3 August 2020 20:15:45 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
3 > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:01 PM Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
4 wrote:
5 > > > On Monday, 3 August 2020 14:18:22 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
6 > > > > Sounds like you want --usepkgonly y --binpkg-respect-use y (the first
7 > > > > is the same as -K). At least, I think that is what you're getting at
8 > > > > - I could be misunderstanding your goal.
9 > > >
10 > > > Not exactly. I'm finding that emerge -K installs every package whose
11 > > > binpkg
12 > > > exists, regardless of whether it's installed in the system already.
13 > > > Emerge
14 > > > -k doesn't. Neither of them takes any notice of what packages are
15 > > > installed in the system, and I think they should.
16 > >
17 > > -k/K have nothing to do with package selection - just the use of
18 > > binary packages.
19 > >
20 > > If you run emerge @core then anything in @core should get installed.
21 > > Adding -K or -k will either allow or force the use of binary packages,
22 > > but it shouldn't cause stuff that isn't in @core to get installed
23 > > unless it is a dependency.
24 >
25 > That's exactly the problem. It does.
26
27 Well, I don't know what's going on. Today it all works perfectly.
28
29 Sorry about the noise.
30
31 --
32 Regards,
33 Peter.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Strange portage behaviour Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>