| 1 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:14 AM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> They are connected to different vlans on the same switch, so they don't |
| 6 |
>> share the same broadcast domain. The switch shows the mac addresses of |
| 7 |
>> the phones only in the expected vlan. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Out of curiosity, have you tried actually sending a broadcast on the |
| 11 |
> VLAN to verify that it actually is implemented correctly? If your |
| 12 |
> switch is mixing ARP across VLANs that would explain this behavior. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Not yet --- and it won't exactly be an easy thing to do. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It's a high-quality switch. If it couldn't keep vlans seperated, the |
| 17 |
customers it was designed for would have them pretty much all replaced |
| 18 |
under warranty. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> I've never messed with VLAN on linux but I'd think that you could |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Me neither; so far, the switch does it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> probably implement VLAN in software and actually save yourself a |
| 25 |
> physical network interface as well (both interfaces could go out over |
| 26 |
> the same wire and be handled appropriately by the switch). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Hm. That might even be possible, in a very complicated setup. Maybe |
| 29 |
some day, I can do that, after lots of learning. |
Archives