From: | Ali Polatel <polatel@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 | ||
Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:16:10 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070531233255.GA22389@mars.solar | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Unionfs for 2.6.20 by Konstantinos Agouros |
1 | Konstantinos Agouros <elwood@×××××××.de> yazmış: |
2 | > Hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > will there be a unionfs for 2.6.20 kernels? AFAIK there's only the 1.5_pre |
5 | > for 2.6.19. |
6 | > |
7 | > Regards, |
8 | > |
9 | > Konstantin |
10 | |
11 | You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can |
12 | either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel. Have a look at |
13 | http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html for more info.. |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | ali polatel (hawking) |
18 | There are more old drunkards than old doctors. |
19 | -- |
20 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 | Norberto Bensa <nbensa@×××.net> |