| 1 |
Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Monday 19 September 2011 16:49:55 David W Noon wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I hope this has explained why we should take messages about running |
| 6 |
> > "revdep-rebuild --library libXXX" seriously. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Well, you have me convinced. I had assumed that a bland revdep-rebuild would |
| 9 |
> catch everything including the library specified. Wrong, I see. |
| 10 |
Would preserved-rebuild catch everything that the revdep-rebuild fails |
| 11 |
to catch? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
| 16 |
How do |
| 17 |
you spend it? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
John Covici |
| 20 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
Archives