1 |
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 23:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
2 |
> On 5/25/06, Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > > Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)... |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > This doesn't look like genkernel: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> |
10 |
> It doesn't have to look, he used the Gentoo installer, and so, it IS GENKERNEL. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> > > I loaded the configuration file from my |
13 |
> > > old kernel and then just make && make install |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > to use genkernel, you have to call genkernel. If he's typing make && |
16 |
> > make install, then he's just using the plain old kernel makefile. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> That if you do a manual install, the installer use it, or better, if |
19 |
> you choose it will use the same kernel as the livecd, that is, voilá, |
20 |
> genkernel. Try it, its pretty cool. |
21 |
|
22 |
Yes, the initial install seems to be from the installer, which would |
23 |
have used genkernel to build a kernel. BUT he then typed "make && make |
24 |
install" himself, rebooted, and voila, he is not using genkernel any |
25 |
more. |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
28 |
|
29 |
The first condition of immortality is death. -Stanislaw Lec |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |