1 |
On Thursday, 5 April 2018 10:20:59 BST Adam Carter wrote: |
2 |
> https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/04/microcode-upd |
3 |
> ate-guidance.pdf |
4 |
> |
5 |
> From |
6 |
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/04/04/intel_spectre_microcode_updates/ |
7 |
> |
8 |
> "The new guidance |
9 |
> <https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/04/microcode-up |
10 |
> date-guidance.pdf>, issued April 2, adds a “stopped” status to Intel’s |
11 |
> “production status” category in its array of available Meltdown and Spectre |
12 |
> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/04/intel_amd_arm_cpu_vulnerability/> |
13 |
> security updates. "Stopped" indicates there will be no microcode patch to |
14 |
> kill off Meltdown and Spectre." |
15 |
> |
16 |
> " "Stopped" CPUs that won’t therefore get a fix are in the Bloomfield, |
17 |
> Bloomfield Xeon, Clarksfield, Gulftown, Harpertown Xeon C0 and E0, Jasper |
18 |
> Forest, Penryn/QC, SoFIA 3GR, Wolfdale, Wolfdale Xeon, Yorkfield, and |
19 |
> Yorkfield Xeon families. The new list includes various Xeons, Core CPUs, |
20 |
> Pentiums, Celerons, and Atoms – just about everything Intel makes. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Most the CPUs listed above are oldies that went on sale between 2007 and |
23 |
> 2011" |
24 |
|
25 |
Thanks for updating the gentoo-user M/L on this topic Adam. |
26 |
|
27 |
Does the lack of a microcode patch mean the in-kernel and other software fixes |
28 |
won't be sufficient to protect PCs running these old CPUs? I'm asking because |
29 |
I have a couple of old laptops I was hoping to get more mileage out of, at |
30 |
least until new generation CPUs become available. Preferably NOT Intel's. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
Mick |