| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:31 on Friday 08 October 2010, Dale did |
| 2 |
opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> But I would still have to recompile again with the qt3support flag if it |
| 5 |
> messed up badly. On this machine, that takes time. During that time, I |
| 6 |
> may not have KDE at all. I did that when I made a mistake a while |
| 7 |
> back. About 12 hours with no GUI. That was with some packages being |
| 8 |
> binary and using -k. If I have to recompile them all, it would take |
| 9 |
> longer still. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Not something I want to repeat. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Dale |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I fail to see why you are even worried about this flag: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
# equery size qt-qt3support |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
* x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.6.3 |
| 21 |
Total files : 428 |
| 22 |
Total size : 7.37 MiB |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If the presence of that teenyweeny package with the few things that require it |
| 26 |
really is an issue for you, then I can state the following with complete |
| 27 |
confidence: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
You should not be using KDE4. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives