| 1 |
Am Dienstag, 18.02.2014 um 14:09 |
| 2 |
schrieb Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >> I can't for the life of me think of any reason that server daemons |
| 5 |
> >> like postfix, dovecot, apache, etc would or could ever *require* |
| 6 |
> >> systemd. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Neither of those packages would ever require systemd (nor any init |
| 9 |
> > system). If they do, I would call that a bug. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Then why should XFCE requiring it also not be a bug? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I totally get XFCE *supporting* the use of logind, but why should it |
| 14 |
> ever support *only* logind? That would seem insane to me. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly but I'm using XFCE, thunar |
| 17 |
and nautilus without systemd and everything is working fine. |
Archives