1 |
On Thursday 02 June 2011 21:28:48 David W Noon wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:00:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: |
5 |
> >On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:26:44 +0100, David W Noon wrote: |
6 |
> [snip] |
7 |
> |
8 |
> >> Now, nearly everybody modifies /etc/updatedb.conf. This does not |
9 |
> >> remove that name from mlocate's manifest. So, Portage knows |
10 |
> >> precisely to which package the file belongs. Hence I think your |
11 |
> >> assertion of "I don't know what this is," is specious. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> >You have picked an excellent example, because mlocate is not the |
14 |
> >package that owns or has owned /etc/updatedb.conf, slocate does too. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Wrong. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> One can (well, could) only have one of slocate and mlocate installed at |
19 |
> any given time. Whichever one is installed owns /etc/updatedb.conf, |
20 |
> unless both have been unmerged and the file is a remnant, but it cannot |
21 |
> be owned by both. Moreover, slocate has been deleted from the main |
22 |
> Portage tree, so it doesn't own anything any more. |
23 |
|
24 |
and it is still installed on some systems. And there is no reason to remove it |
25 |
on uninstalling slocate if you plan to install mlocate. |
26 |
|
27 |
Don't touch things you did not install. |
28 |
|
29 |
Is the only sane rule for packet manager. |