| 1 |
Sven Köhler wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then, |
| 3 |
>> I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because |
| 4 |
>> the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> .UTF-8 changed from .utf8? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yep. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> That's not true. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Wrong, it is. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never |
| 15 |
> creates such locales. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
There's no such flag as "userlocales". |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> I also looked it up on a Redhat-System: no .UTF-8 locales. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Well. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
QOTD: |
| 30 |
"If I'm what I eat, I'm a chocolate chip cookie." |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives