Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: tmp on tmpfs | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 May 2017 04:45:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | slrnoicoba.mc8.martin@lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] tmp on tmpfs by Andrew Savchenko |
||
| 1 | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > For similar needs I found zswap the most suitable, it's so much |
| 3 | > better than zram: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This sounds like one is an alternative to the other. |
| 6 | This is not the case. It can even make sense to use them together. |
| 7 | For instance, the swap device necessarily required for zswap |
| 8 | can be a zram device. Whether this is advantegous depends on your |
| 9 | usage pattern and swappiness value. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: tmp on tmpfs | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |