Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Franklin Wang <touch21st@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:17:16
Message-Id: 5305578C.9060903@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? by Facundo Curti
1 Debian's powerful and stable, and I like apt very much. Gentoo and arch
2 can be used for soho. Google uses red hat in datacenter with a
3 customized kernel, and facebook started the project of open compute. are
4 several RISC processors going to die?
5
6 On 2014年02月20日 08:53, Facundo Curti wrote:
7 > I think a "more stable" distro is better for production. My choice is
8 > debian. I think you cant find nothing more stable that debian...
9 >
10 > >Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where
11 > the admin knows each and every aspect of the os.
12 >
13 > This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production.
14 > The system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the
15 > system? This will use all the processor and the system will be
16 > overloaded. This means users can't use the system when this is updating...
17 >
18 > I think the best for a server is debian. I didn't try red hat but I
19 > see this like a commercial distro :/ Any way, red hat is very used as
20 > server. And if you choice to pay, you will have official support
21 > (Other wise, you are alone :/)
22 >
23 > P.D: I'm sorry if my english is not perfect, i speak spanish
24 >
25 >
26 > 2014-02-19 21:36 GMT-03:00 Franklin Wang <touch21st@×××××.com
27 > <mailto:touch21st@×××××.com>>:
28 >
29 > Maybe it's intresting, although I prefer to use red hat, suse or
30 > ubuntu in datacenter as Google. Slackware servers're not very
31 > poppular here
32 >
33 > On 2014年02月20日 08:14, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
34 >>
35 >> On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, "Franklin Wang" <touch21st@×××××.com
36 >> <mailto:touch21st@×××××.com>> wrote:
37 >> >
38 >> > and what about slackware for server?
39 >> >
40 >> >
41 >> > -------- Original Message --------
42 >> > Subject:
43 >> > How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?
44 >> > Date:
45 >> > Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800
46 >> > From:
47 >> > Franklin Wang <touch21st@×××××.com <mailto:touch21st@×××××.com>>
48 >> > To:
49 >> > gentoo-server@l.g.o
50 >> <mailto:gentoo-server@l.g.o>,
51 >> gentoo-cluster@l.g.o
52 >> <mailto:gentoo-cluster@l.g.o>
53 >> >
54 >> >
55 >> > Hi all,
56 >> >
57 >> > I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you
58 >> tell me
59 >> > the experience about them? Thanks.
60 >> >
61 >> >
62 >> >
63 >> >
64 >> > Franklin Wang
65 >> >
66 >> >
67 >> >
68 >>
69 >> Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os
70 >> where the admin knows each and every aspect of the os. Security
71 >> wise, there are no unwanted or unused stuff, so lesser bugs to
72 >> deal with.
73 >>
74 >> Clustering, well, you can do that using glusterfs
75 >>
76 >
77 > --
78 > skype:touch21st, Gtalk:touch21st, Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@×××××.com <mailto:Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@×××××.com>,
79 > Xing/Linkedin:Franklin Wang
80 >
81 >
82
83 --
84 skype:touch21st, Gtalk:touch21st, Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@×××××.com,
85 Xing/Linkedin:Franklin Wang