| 1 |
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 12:26:09 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100 |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a |
| 7 |
> >> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they |
| 8 |
> >> want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > For them to have support for sleep and hibernate, someone needs to |
| 11 |
> > develop / maintain it in order to adapt to kernel API changes; as long |
| 12 |
> > as the only one doing this is systemd, you'll work towards only it |
| 13 |
> > being supported there in the future. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Correct, and to name an example, pm-utils is still using the old |
| 16 |
> wireless stack and |
| 17 |
> 'wireless-utils' instead of 'iw' |
| 18 |
> As in, pm-utils is using kernel options that are marked as DEPRECATED in |
| 19 |
> the menuconfig, and DEPRECATED means they are going away at some point So |
| 20 |
> it won't be long the package is broken for every machine that has wireless |
| 21 |
> card |
| 22 |
> I'm sure there are multiple other examples available, but this one pops |
| 23 |
> up to |
| 24 |
> mind immediately |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Fair enough, I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine and |
| 27 |
it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
Mick |
Archives