| 1 |
On 2013-08-30 10:38 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 30/08/2013 16:37, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Personally, I think it only 'makes sense' to put files critical to the |
| 4 |
>> boot process into <gasp!> /boot. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> It's not the boot process. It's the startup-to-early-init process. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Or put another way, the entire start process up to the point where all |
| 9 |
> of /usr is reliably available. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> "boot" is used here as very loose slang |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Understood and point taken, but I think my point remains nevertheless... |
Archives