| 1 |
On 30 October 2006 17:59, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 30 October 2006 16:57, Harm Geerts wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 30 October 2006 13:54, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Hi all, |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > I seem to be missing my loop devices in /dev... |
| 7 |
> > > And I don't find any docs on the current method to do this. I |
| 8 |
> > > imagine it's done with udev rules - anyone have working rules for |
| 9 |
> > > this that they'd be willing to share? |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > alan |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Do you have support for loop devices in your kernel? |
| 14 |
> > udev has default rules for this in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Problem solved! With the last kernel upgrade I must have changed my loop |
| 17 |
> devices from compiled in to modular, and there's no "loop" entry |
| 18 |
> in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6. If I "modprobe loop" everything |
| 19 |
> works like it's supposed to. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Hm... My loop devices are compiled as modules, I don't have any loop entry |
| 22 |
in /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6 - but my loop devices are all there |
| 23 |
under /dev. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Magic? White magic, black magic? Actually, this white=good and black=bad stuff |
| 26 |
is a bit of a no-no here in Africa. ;-) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Uwe |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective. |
| 32 |
http://www.SysEx.com.na |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives